Sorry for the delay in replying to this post, Chris.
This non-contiguous parcel is not currently contemplated as part of the project. We will clarify this as we move forward with SEQR.
« Summary of April 29, 2008 Public Meeting | Main | Equestrian? »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8354ba58f53ef00e553d5d4ba8834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference SBL 62.4-2-39:
The comments to this entry are closed.
Comments